Homepage › Forums › General Photography › Low Fidelity Photography › First images from the LUBITEL
- This topic is empty.
First images from the LUBITEL
-
aoluainParticipant
Ran a roll of Fujichrome Provia 400f slide film through my recently aquired Lubitel 166B.
This was my first roll through it so I didnt quite know how they would come out.Thanks to the Martins for the info . . . https://www.photographyireland.net/viewtopic.php?t=29499
The film was cross processed by my usual lab at no extra cost !
There were a few nice ones, they can be seen here http://www.lofiimage.com/Lubitel.html
These 2 are my favs so far!
f22 ~ 1/250th approx. Film expired 11-2004 [no post processing]
Mick451ParticipantjessthespringerParticipantFlipping hell Alan!!! These are brilliant! Really, really like them. The colours are lovely,
and you’ve done really well with the exposure, light meter?Had a look at the pictures on your site, love the one of your dog :)
Where did you buy the expired film?
aoluainParticipantThanks a million Mick and Sinead.
I got the film from e-bay. Pack of 5 x 120 format for about €18.00 !
I used the Gossen light meter I got recently specifically for this little ‘Project’
It was accurate enough but the days I took these were really bright
and the settings on the camera were at their MAX! f22 & 1/250th some with f16 though
with iso 400 obviously, might have to get a ND filter !I find the combination of really sunny weather and X process slide film good. Overcast
days dont give the same results, and that conclusion is from running 1 roll of x pro film :lol:my observations anyway.
I did a lot of film photography back in the days starting out and I never shot slide film ever!
So 1st roll of slide film shot through my 1st TLR ! great fun.
Thanks again,
Alan
jb7ParticipantYes, I’d agree, they’re lovely-
but hardly low fi at all, at this scale-
they look good edge to edge-
how do they look at a larger scale?The compositions are great, that’s what makes them,
although the processing is adding something too-
wonderful to think that’s just a one click (inside your head) decision too…aoluainParticipantThanks Joseph!
Lo-Fi . . . Hhhhmmmmm I know what you mean.
I have read a bit on the Lubitel and it does produce some
very good non-lo-fi shots, but it is a plastic body with a very
nasty rear door. I was fearing that all of these would have been
fogged to fheck.I had to seal around the rear door similar to the AV-1 project
I did a while back . . .https://www.photographyireland.net/viewtopic.php?t=27718
There is a bit of a light leak though in the top right hand corner
which can be seen on some of the other images, im not worried about it though.Well there is a lot more exposure control on this compared to the holga anyway :)
The full size image looks to be very grainy and sharp’ish all over that could be my focusing
though. The viewfinder is not fully ground glass but just a circle in the middle and the pop
up shade has a silly little pop out magnifiying glass for focusing, a bit annoying really.Ah I think it is lo-fi, it is a nice little unit but the build quality is a bit higgelty piggelty :lol:
ok ill stop now
Alan
FintanParticipantLovely images. Well done.
The Lubi is definitely not a toy camera, the images are often great. But are Lubi’s Lo-Fi? yes definitely IMHO
EddieParticipantLove the colours, as already said really sharp images and exposures are accurate, the processing reminds me of the old Agfa slide films. Lubitel always had a great reputation for good quality images at around f8.
jessthespringerParticipantEvery time I look at that second picture I think of the film, ‘No Country For Old Men’
Eerie, I love that.
SeoirseMemberWell done on these images Alan – they look superb. :D
As a person who owned and used a Lubitel for 20 years or more I can tell you that although they may be made of cheap
light metal and plastic they certainly DO NOT deliver Lo-Fi images.
At f8-f16 or so you would be hard pushed to choose the images from those taken with a Hasselblad, Rollei or Mamiya.
The only difference is that the Lubitel lens is a bit soft at the edges if your enlargements are above say 12 x 12 and it
doesn’t handle sun flare as well as it might if it were a more expensive lens.
I sold mine to Mark for a fiver :cry: …Jesus I must be mad.
aoluainParticipantGuys Thanks a million again for the comments.
I love the results from my first slide roll.
‘NO country for old men’ havnt seen that yet, i’ll be on the lookout for that Sinead.
Eddie, Fintan and Seoirse thanks! Yes Iread also that the lubitel can produce images
close in quality to the big gun’s.Alan
MartinOCParticipantThese are great Alan, as are the others on your site.
Wonderful subjects, composition and colour.I hope its a sunny summer, looking forward to more.
Martin
aoluainParticipantHi Martin,
Thanks for that.
It was your results from the holga day out that ignited the spark for me !!
https://www.photographyireland.net/viewtopic.php?t=28645
Cheers Alan
MartinOCParticipantYour colours came out much better, more subtle.
I’m wondering if it was the lens or the lab.
Mine were also posted without any potato-chopping, but my colours were very saturated, not much hue or tone gradation.Martin
aoluainParticipantThe film was/is over 4 years put of date, that might play a part.
I did like the colouring in your own results though, more saturation.
I think I would have liked a more dramatic look to them, edging towards
the look of your ones.The one on the site of the tall tree doesnt have much of a x process to it IMO . . .
food for thought
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.