- This topic is empty.
Islam in Dublin – again
-
I like the first three and the last, there is a sense of humaness about them – they make me want to find out more. 4 & 5 are not so strong – I think they are missing out compositionally.
I’ve come back to these a good few times. surprised they’ve attracted little comment. Would love to see them a tad bigger, esp no. 5.
These are amazing. Seriously good work. I usually hate watermarks but I would understand why you would have them on your photos, they deserve watermarks. The 1st two would be my favourites.
Are these shot on film?
Just browsing your website now.. I must say I’m jealous you’re shooting what I want to shoot.
Covey wrote:
I’ve come back to these a good few times. surprised they’ve attracted little comment. Would love to see them a tad bigger, esp no. 5.
Yeah, I dont think the subject matter is everyones cup of tea. I dont mind. At least nobody blasted the photography (chuckle). Then again, most posts attract few comments anyway.
daz0rz wrote:
These are amazing. Seriously good work. I usually hate watermarks but I would understand why you would have them on your photos, they deserve watermarks. The 1st two would be my favourites.
Are these shot on film?
Just browsing your website now.. I must say I’m jealous you’re shooting what I want to shoot.
I often dont understand why watermarks are not used by many others, to be honest. Yep, all shot on B & W film, always. I would upgrade to a quality digital if I could afford it. But, it has to be said, the geek in me loves the process of film usage.
Cheers for the comments lads anyway.
The thing is a lot of photo’s with watermarks are generally bad. Thought it was film alright. Bet it was leica as well. You can always tell by how the images look, that glass does wonderful things.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
