- This topic is empty.
WHich do you prefer
-
Appreciate your feedback on which of the following images you prefer ?
1
2
3
4
5
#1 wins it for me!
it looks a more natural representation.
again I would go for a 2:1 crop to loose the foreground.
Lovely colours though and a very nice scene, well done.
No. 1 for me and second choice would be No.5. But in both cases I would crop the foreground.
regarding #3 the only noticeable subject (the house) is predominantly composed of whites/highlights, and is very flat and lacking tonal detail in comparison to the surrounding environment – so the B&W serves to hide it – which results in no real focus for me in that photo. cropping half the width from left, and 1/4 height both top & bottom might make it more striking
I prefere #2….
for me the composition is mush better and not as messy as the bushes in #1..i also like #3..
the house looks a wee bit bright on this screen but that should be easy fixed!!
i`d also lose a bit from the bottom!!!they`re all great images 8)
Hi,
I think its key to get the house and the bridge in so as much as i like the b&w(apart from the lack of detail as already said in the house) it can’t really win out. I like the first but the foreground is messy (as said) and the house looks distorted which is a shame. the house looks undistorted in no.2. i like the crop idea to remove the bushes.
if there was any other angle you could get to narrow the distance from house to bridge, to compress with a zoom to get them both nearer together. maybe from the other side of the river? all in all though they are nice shots. maybe gausian blur the foreground and bits around the sides?
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
