Homepage › Forums › Photo Critique › Architecture / Urban Landscapes / Streetscapes › Amsterdam Canal at Night
- This topic is empty.
Amsterdam Canal at Night
-
achtungbarryParticipantJonnyp16vParticipant
Really like this shot, the light streak adds to it. Would love to go back there again and bring a camera.
brownieParticipantHelenParticipantI love it – stunning image.
Just being nosey how many second of an exposure did you give this shot?
achtungbarryParticipantHelen wrote:
I love it – stunning image.
Just being nosey how many second of an exposure did you give this shot?
Here’s all the details Helen:
Focal Lenght: 15 mm using Sigma 10-20
ISO: 100
Aperture: f18
Shutter Speed: 30 seconds
HelenParticipantThanks for the info – 30 seconds cool. I love doing long exposures myself. Its a gorgeous shot. Well done.
stevie glennMemberlovely shot. been there myself but was a stag weekend :)
but always wanted to go back for a weekend with the camera some many lovely sites to take photos off.
wirepicParticipantcharleyParticipantDanBParticipantOk, look: I don’t want to be the only one here being the negative one by pointing the finger to the obvious issues. I like the image, very atmospheric and dynamic. I’d love to be there and have a shot at it. But…my architect (nosy) eye has to say something.
After many deliberations, and many decisions not to spoil the fun, I must say that the elevations of the canal houses are not vertical :| .
I checked the image against a series of vertical guides and there are some of them leaning toward left and others towards right. And interestingly there’s not a pattern from left to right suggesting me this is due to the wide lens distortion. Some verticals are indeed vertical :) but it alternates with non-verticals. So, what is it? One shot or a blend of 2-3 shots put together as a panoramic shot? Quite hard considering the trailing lights of the boat…Please tell us, this thing is eating me…
achtungbarryParticipantHello Dan,
Let me try to take you out of your misery :D .
Firstly, this is a single exposure, not a stitch. Secondly, I did use a very wide angle lens. The focal lenght here is is 15mm which would explain the elevations not being vertical. As for there not being a pattern, I think what has happened here is that I had pointed the lens ever so slightly downwards to capture the light trails. This seems to have created a reverse keystoning effect where the tops of the buildings are wider than the base. So the pattern is like a fan. I did a very slight correction in photoshop after to make the effect less pronounced. This said, many many of the buildings in Amsterdam are not vertical at all with upper levers overhanging the street.
Hope this cleared it up for you.
DanBParticipantHi Barry,
Thanks for clearing that out. As I said, having some stitched images was unlikely, but hey, I had to ask :)
And since I’ve posted the question, I too realized that you get funny distortions with wide angle lenses if only you accidentally raise/ lower the lens towards the subject. Silly me…RobMemberVery nice scene, good exposure. Thanks for explaining the keystoning, the only
thing that bothered me too…Semmick PhotoParticipantLovely photo. Love the light trail disappearing under the bridge.
Its Keizersgracht btw, but thats just a typo. Take it from a Dutchman.
Just in relation to the settings, on what date and what time did you take the photo?
Cheers
DPSParticipant
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.