I like no’ 2 as it gives the eyes room to move about the picture
but as for the others, I feel that they are almost claustrophobic.
I think it would have been better to have the people in a solid
state rather than a blur if you get me but that’s just my preference.
I think #2 would also be my favourite also, even though it looks a bit soft in places. I like the slightly grittier look of #3 as well but the blurred person is catching my attention too much. I wonder if they could all be improved a bit with the addition of some grain in PS and a bit of a contrast boost? Just my opinion – not exactly an expert myself :D
Still though, it’s always nice to see shots of places I’ve not been to. Thanks for posting.
Mark
generally I hate seeing the the person without some motion as it kind of plays off the structural and stable nature of the architecture vrs the movement of people.
with out looking at exif data so I didn’t properly analyse your style I would suggest there are 2 technical issues:
focusing seemed soft possibly you opened up the aperture to wide and created a shallow DoF
Highlights were a touch over blown out for my taste, a few extra exposures of using the RAW file might help with that