- This topic is empty.
:-)
-
This was a little bit of a printing mistake, really underexposed, but, it made me laugh when I saw it…
Just though I’d share :mrgreen:
Sinead
Hi Sinead,
Could be a good one for where or what is it.
It could last a while.It’s a tad underexposed alright.
:?
John.
Brilliant…
You might want to save that one for the next caption competition.. ;)
Now there’s one for the exhibition…
What’s his name?
would be great if he was called Don…Fine Art, wouldn’t you think?
And while we’re at it, it looks mostly very sunny…
Thanks all…
John – it was just this one print that I underexposed, the neg was fine, and I did have a version that is well exposed, but I liked this better,
even just for the comedy value!Rob – Oh dear God no!! This is art you know!!
Joseph – Now, you should know that a lady never tells… Don? huh? Sunny? What am I missing?
Mick – lol!! No, but, now that you’ve put that idea in my head… (an idea for Z’s PG event!!)
Gigi- *tuts and shakes head* :lol:
Thanks again, glad you all liked it…
even at the crack of Dawn, there’s a place where the sun don’t shine…
Surely it’s over exposed…
No, the neg was fine… The print is underexposed, not enough time under the enlarger, that’s underexposed, right?
Ah right-
so if you wanted to,
you could be showing the picture you meant to take?Yes, I did make a well exposed print, but I didn’t like it. I like this, for the comedy value… Am I repeating myself?
jessthespringer wrote:
Yes, I did make a well exposed print, but I didn’t like it. I like this, for the comedy value… Am I repeating myself?
Hi Sinead,
Could be a good one for where or what is it.
It could last a while.It’s a tad underexposed alright.
John.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
