- This topic is empty.
Anyone know where this is?
-
……well it exists only inside my mind!
I thought it would be interesting to post one of my 3-D renders here to see what you think. Although you couldn’t really call this photo-realistic, I have only picked up the basics, and a new program called Terragen 2 is really set to improve upon the quality. Has anyone else tried this type of thing?
My image:
Some images from Terragen 2. How would you feel if one of these beat your photograph in an ‘imaging contest?’
http://www.planetside.co.uk/gallery/v/tg2gallery/saurav_subedi_24.jpg.html
http://www.planetside.co.uk/gallery/v/tg2gallery/raphael_villette_losse.jpeg.html
SteveD wrote:
How would you feel if one of these beat your photograph in an ‘imaging contest?’
No problem if it was entered in a “Creative” category, if in a basic category then I dont think it should be allowed as its not a photograph.
Have to agree – digital art /3d art is just not the same as photography – aside from some people confusing the 2 sometimes theres no similarity at all. An oil painting and a photograph have about as much in common in my opinion.
I didn’t say it could be entered into a photography competition!!! I said an ‘imaging’ contest.
My point was that 3D renders are becoming more and more realistic, and eventually it will be difficult to distinguish between a photo and a render!
I’ve been using Terragen,Anim8or and truespace for a few years now and whwn combined with PS its very hard to tell reality from CG in a lot of images.Check out some of the 3d sites and you’ll see what I mean :wink:
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
