Homepage › Forums › Photo Critique › Landscape › Atlantic Cove
- This topic is empty.
Atlantic Cove
-
andy mcinroyParticipant
This portfolio was partly inspired by the work of Andrew Nadolski and his recent book, “The End of the Land”. I would really welcome some critique on this set of images.
http://www.andymcinroy.com/2port.htm
These images were taken in overcast light (some might even say bad light) with a strong focus on shape, texture and subtle colour. The images were all taken in a small cove near Clonmany on the Inishowen coastline of Donegal. All were captured within a space of 50 meters. In contrast to Nadolski’s work, these images were captured in just 3 hours compared to the 10 years Nadolski spent on “his” Cornish beach of Port Nanvan. This self imposed limitation has hopefully resulted in a consistent set of images both in terms of the lighting and the compositions.
Enjoy
AndyNot Pete the blokeParticipantamcinroy wrote:
Enjoy…
I certainly did! WOW is the word!
I loved the shot in your portfolio called Benone Fisherman – reminds me of a painting which a friend has on his study wall.
ValentiaMember_brian_ParticipantThorstenMemberamcinroy wrote:
This portfolio was partly inspired by the work of Andrew Nadolski and his recent book, “The End of the Land”.
Wasn’t he recently profiled in Outdoor Photography magazine?
Some nice work there by the way. Seems like you spend a good deal of time at it. I had a look at some other corners of your site too and there’s a strong body of work there. A few of your images almost immediately reminded me of a little known landscape photographer (but one of my favourites) Paul Wakefield.
RobMemberCan only agree with the comments already made. Welcome to the forum btw. 8)
richiehatchMemberandy mcinroyParticipantThanks for all the comments folks.
Thorsten, it was the article in Outdoor Photography that inspired me to try this style. What impressed me most was how Andrew Nadolski had photographed in light that most landscape photoghers would normally steer well clear of. And this included wide views including sky as well as the more intimite shots. A very fresh approach. I got the impression from the article that Joe Cornish was humbled by Andrew’s work.
I’ve been doing landcape photography for over 10 years but when I shot these 8 images I experienced something I have never felt before, a groove you could say. I hope that doesn’t sound pretentious but I have never created such a satisfactory set of consistent images before. And the funny thing is that they felt almost effortless (My 1st portfolio took 6 months to put together, this one took 3 hours). When I got home and put together the portfolio together I decided that I would never add to the series. I know that the light would never be the same but more importantly I also know that my thought processes will not be the same either.
Regards
AndyThorstenMemberAndy – thanks for the insight into your thought process behind these images. It’s great to hear all the technical stuff, but what I find even more interesting is why people created a particular image and the thought processes behind it. Reminds me that instead of always asking in the forum how someone took a shot I should be asking why did they take it. :D
You’ve also highlighted another interesting point regarding landscape photography. For some reason we assume a landscape image to be a grand vista with rolling hilss and fluffy clouds. OK, I know I’m stretching it here, but just trying to emphasise the point that too often we fail to look at what just below our feet, and yet it can be just as powerful an image as the grand view, if not even more so.
ciaranParticipantReally really superb images Andy. I’m glad I delved into the landscape section now :) Welcome to the forum!
LoGillParticipantWelcome to the site Andy
Gorgeous shots… and a bit of a kick in the arse for me .. (I keep bitching about “bad” light .. thats shut me up :D)
Lorraine
ValentiaMemberAndy, slightly OT I know but could you recommend a good light tripod that won’t entail a trip to the bank manager.
Thanks,
Danny
andy mcinroyParticipantValentia,
I personally use a manfrotto tripod (055). I prefer a heavier tripod (although my back would say different) and the Manfrotto is rock solid. I think the tripod is almost as important as the camera so don’t skimp.
I did start off with a cheap Jessops ?30 aluminium one but got rid of it after a short time (or was it blown away? can remember). Manfrotto make a range of carbon fibre tripods which are lighter but they are also more expensive and I doubt that they would be as stable in a strong wind. Don’t forget to budget in for a head. For landscape I would recommend a good ball head with a quick release plate. It makes recomposing shots a doddle. If I were to buy a new tripod I would go for the Manfrotto 055PRO as it has a removable centre column which can be positioned horizontally across the top of the legs. Ideal for ground level work e.g for macro.
Hope this helps
AndyValentiaMemberExcellent thanks a million. I have a Manfrotto, not sure what model, with the pushy in things that allow you tp move all the legs at the one time. It’s so heavy I raraly use it. I used to use it for weddings in a previous life. Maybe I should just make a bigger effort though I cant see myself lugging it up to the top of Skellig Michael.
I just had a look at the 055PRO and it looks very good and portable, size wise anyway.
Thanks again.
Danny
EDIT: The prices are very good too ;-)
ThorstenMemberI’m a big fan of ball-heads as well, but for landscapes and architectural photography, I like to use the 410 JUNIOR GEARED HEAD. This head enables you to make minute adjustments in any of three axes, and when used in conjunction with a hot-shoe spirit level there’s no more excuse for sloping horizons or tilting verticals :)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.