Search
Generic filters
Exact matches only

Bird ID

  • This topic is empty.

Bird ID

  • Rob
    Member

    Okay, I think I have the whole duck, crow, robin, swan and goose thing sorted, but
    I have no idea what this is. My continuing avian education…

    … and the 100% crop for anyone interested…

    PeteTheBloke
    Member
    Rob
    Member

    Cheers Pete. I’m getting there…

    Rob.

    joe_elway
    Participant

    Rob, did you do anything to remove noise to the image? It looks very smooth, i.e. no feather detail.

    Rob
    Member

    Aidan,

    I’m not sure why I lost so much detail, and sharpening hasn’t helped to
    bring out any more without creating noise. This was shot at ISO 100, f3.5,
    200mm and 1/640 sec. I can only put it down to camera shake and possible
    movement of the subject. I’ll have to check some of the other shots I have
    and see if they retained any feather detail. I just posted this one because it
    was the most pleasing compositionally.

    Rob.

    joe_elway
    Participant

    Very odd. It really looks like Noise Ninja hammered it to death.

    Rob
    Member

    joe_elway wrote:

    Very odd. It really looks like Noise Ninja hammered it to death.

    Don’t even have Noise Ninja! Come to think of it, I took quite a few shots while
    I was walking along following this little one… Perhaps I should always stop before
    pressing that shutter… :oops:

    Rob.

    jb7
    Participant

    200mm at f/3.5?
    on a 2.8 lens?
    That’s a nice piece of glass you’ve got there Rob,
    is it possible that the focus point is a little in front of the speckled songster?

    Some of the veg in front of it looks quite sharp in the reduction-

    Good comp though, and colour-
    and you really must have been up close for such a small bird-
    I can see why you’re thinking about a converter,
    with that lens it must be quite a temptation-

    j

    Rob
    Member

    jb7 wrote:

    I can see why you’re thinking about a converter,
    with that lens it must be quite a temptation-

    j

    It most certainly is Joseph, it certainly is. Thanks for the comments.
    Still have to trawl through the rest of the rubbish I shot and see what
    I can come up with…

    Rob.

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.