- This topic is empty.
Christine
-
For those more in the know about fashion let me have your thoughts please.
Hi Jason.
As these are fashion shots, the clothing should be unobstructed & not cropped. #1 is a bit dark & the belt & hair in #2 is partially blown, but the texture of the garments is nicely shown. Otherwise they are very nice shots.thanks Miki – showing my lack of knowledge there, thanks for the tips. I guess i was thinking the look and the pose were fashion :) – personally fashion aside i like #1 as a model image and #2 prob could pull exposure back a touch – done nothing to either in post these are straight from camera except the watermark applied by host website
Just a quick reply – of course you can crop your shots for fashion (or whatever). What a strange thing to say.
Hi JohnBW.
My point was, as fashion shots are normally taken to promote & sell items of clothing & normally commissioned by retail chains, they want a clear view of the clothing. In these shots, it’s not clear how long the dress is (ie knee lenght or longer). If the shots were to display the belt or a top, cropping wouldn’t matter, so long as the belt or top were clearly shown. The model (although good looking), basically becomes a clothes hanger (no offence intended) & is just there to show how the clothes can look when worn.Personally, I like how these shots were taken, but not as “Fashion” shots, but rather as portraits or model shots (used to promote the model herself) with a fashion look & feel to them. :D
I like the second shot best, great lighting , nicely framed at the bottom and no dodgy elbow;)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
