- This topic is empty.
lens:??? will i wont i
-
hi everyone..
after being offered 2 lens 70-200 f2.8 is usm and a 100-400 f4.5-5.6 usm.. both are L series.was gona trade up this year anyway. to a good wildlife and sports lens.. both were used about 10 times.. i know the lens and are in mint cond..
ive ony taaking up photography seriously in the last year.. think these would be both fantasic lens.. i use a cannon 50d…big question.. what are both these worth together… have a fair idea… but said i would throw it out there… thanks
Dont know their worth, but why would you buy the two? the 70-200 is a better option, in
my opinion. You can put a convertor on that and still have a useable lens if you used a 2 x conv
it would give you 140-400 f5.6 which covers the other lens anyway. Just a thought :)cant be bought seperate.. but prob with the vision of selling one.. making the other one cheap,,:-)
hi
IMHO, buy both, if not give me an address, i will :-)Jenny 70-200 NEVER will have got that same quality with converter as 100-400,
other option ? buy two and sell one of them :-) ,chris
shutterbug wrote:
I bow to your superior knowledge Chris :)
hmm, I sniffed a little sarcasm here ;-) ;-) :-) :-)
very shame that theoretical knowledge does not go hand in hand with the practice :-(
Chris
thanks chris..
i had heard this one night at a meeting..and wasnt sure… thanks a million to u both.. think ill buy two and keep the two.. think they will fullfill all my needs.. :D well most of them… :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:tsergairl wrote:
shutterbug wrote:
I bow to your superior knowledge Chris :)
hmm, I sniffed a little sarcasm here ;-) ;-) :-) :-)
very shame that theoretical knowledge does not go hand in hand with the practice :-(
Chris
No sarcasm at all, I meant it, I know nothing about Canon :D
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
