There does appear to be a softness to it,
and a lack of detail-
and there seems to be another species muscling into the foreground,
is there a reason why you didn’t remove it?
I don’t think it adds to the picture-
I know nothing of these things,
whether it might be a species under threat,
but it looks like a subject that would do well in controlled lighting,
and perhaps with a more controlled backround-
I suppose as a subject for a still life in a studio-
which could be a tabletop sized studio,
considering the size of the subject-
Although I could be suggesting wanton death and destruction,
and I wouldn’t want to do that-
I don’t think it’s threatened (unless you visit Donegal, maybe) but it’s the only example I’ve ever spotted.
I probably could have moved the grass stalks without “interfering with nature”.
As for the other problems, I probably need to hone my PS skills.
I might have been looking at the background while moving sliders,
hence the ruined highlights i.e. the flowers themselves.
I probably need to hone my PS skills.
I might have been looking at the background while moving sliders,
hence the ruined highlights i.e. the flowers themselves.
Suggestion for you: before you do anything in PS, copy your shot to a new layer and work on it there. I always leave my background untouched, and therefore can always go back to where I started, or add a mask in to reveal some of it, if required.