Homepage › Forums › Photo Critique › Landscape › Mullinhassig Waterfall This topic is empty. Mullinhassig Waterfall phillipMember February 13, 2012 at 4:14 pm couple of shots from today, shots really dont show the scale of the waterfall, but approx 3m in height. Camera Canon EOS 7D Exposure 120 Aperture f/8.0 Focal Length 18 mm ISO Speed 100 Filter B&W ND110 Mullinhassig Waterfall by phillipcullinane, on Flickr Camera Canon EOS 7D Exposure 60 Aperture f/8.0 Focal Length 70 mm ISO Speed 100 Filter B&W ND110 Mullinhassig Waterfall by phillipcullinane, on Flickr connieParticipant February 13, 2012 at 5:36 pm Love the second one but would like to see a little more detail in the rocks on both shots. :D insertnamehereParticipant February 13, 2012 at 5:49 pm Lovely photos, I like the second in particular. They have a nice fine art look, but I think there’s not enough going on in the first. The second shot holds your attention more. Mark. shutterbugParticipant February 13, 2012 at 7:15 pm Agree with Connie, more detail, seem a little dark overall. AnonymousParticipant February 13, 2012 at 11:58 pm Two beautiful shots, although I think I would crop a little off the bottom on image one. phillipMember February 14, 2012 at 3:55 pm thanks for the comments, much appreciated another in colour Mullinhassig Waterfall by phillipcullinane, on Flickr shutterbugParticipant February 14, 2012 at 6:04 pm I think the colour version works so much better, lots of detail included, very nice indeed! RASMITH32Member February 14, 2012 at 7:12 pm Yes colour works for me. Like the vignetting approach to processing too, kind of draws you into the shot Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total) You must be logged in to reply to this topic.