Search
Generic filters
Exact matches only

Narrow Water Castle Wedding

Homepage Forums Photo Critique Catch All Weddings Narrow Water Castle Wedding

  • This topic is empty.

Narrow Water Castle Wedding

  • PeteMcD
    Member

    A few recent ones..

    eas
    Participant

    hi Pete,

    last one looks like a winner to me, nice shot.

    PeteMcD
    Member

    Thanks eas. It all came together in that one. The light, the moment, the separation from the background.

    eas
    Participant

    definitely, was wondering how this is lit?

    PeteMcD
    Member

    I had a 430EX flash back right, set on one of the bass cans at about waist height. Fired in TTL with a 580 on camera. Trickled in as much ambient as I could handheld.

    Allinthemind
    Participant

    Lovely shots… Are you adding the defocus or is it your lens? Looks like a tilt lens effect.

    Si

    PeteMcD
    Member

    Thanks Si.

    The defocus is done in post—I think it is a little over-blurred actually.

    I can’t justify a tilt shift lens, though I’ve been wishing for one more and more often. When you can recreate the effect in PS in 2 min it is hard to justify a £700 lens. I think if I was shooting more architecture then the tilt shift would pay for itself, but it’s not worth it just to create a defocused effect, which is really just a (faddy) stylistic treatment.

    jessthespringer
    Participant

    I’m not so sure about the defocus effect Pete. It’s a bit strong for my taste, I’m not sure the pictures need it,
    they’re both very strong without it.
    Have you printed them? I saw some pictures with this effect in a friends wedding album recently,
    it was very obvious PP and I couldn’t figure out why the photographer felt the need to do it, the pictures were quite nice without it,
    I just didn’t think the effect added anything to the print.

    Sorry if that sounds harsh…

    You did really well with the third, it’s lovely. And, I know how dark that room is, which makes it all the more impressive.

    Sinead

    PeteMcD
    Member

    Thanks Sinead. I think I agree with you—the effect is too strong and is becoming (ironically) the focal point of the image. I haven’t printed them yet, but I’m pretty sure they will look too strong. I appreciate your honest feedback.
    P

    5faythe
    Participant

    Hi Pete,

    I hope I’m not just repeating what’s already been said.
    I have come back to these a few times since you first posted.

    From first view #3 looked really good. I’d be well pleased with
    that if ’twas mine.

    I have’nt been able to figure out #1 at all. Maybe if there was something
    really interesting going on at the doorway.

    #2 had real potential. The candles & hallway leading towards
    the couple is good.
    Maybe if they were facing this way or in a tender pose like #3.
    If the 3rd person was’nt there.
    It definitely has a lovely athmosphere.

    I find that blurring added in post processing has to be quite subtle to look natural.

    I like what you were trying to do and #3 makes it worth the effort.

    All in my opinion of course.

    Well done.

    John.

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.