Search
Generic filters
Exact matches only

No more critique, critique is dead.

Homepage Forums General Photography The Lounge No more critique, critique is dead.

  • This topic is empty.

No more critique, critique is dead.

  • thedarkroom
    Participant

    I got 64.5% for this

    :D

    jb7
    Participant

    I’m not sure if I should say this, but I think low scores might be better.
    Or not. I don’t know.

    Yes, David is right, if they did witty banter, that’d be good.

    And Martin is right too, if they could come up with another program that took the pictures,
    then we could all happily give up, and just allow the machines to talk to each other.

    Is that happening already?

    Mick451
    Participant
    BM
    Participant

    Mr. H, Aoluan and Restless Native: they must be crap photographs, then, if they got such low scores.

    You really should learn from these tools and go out and try to do better.

    aoluain
    Participant
    jb7 wrote:
    I’m not sure if I should say this, but I think low scores might be better. Or not. I don’t know.

    :lol:

    5faythe
    Participant

    5faythe wrote:

    I stuck 2 in.
    Rated them at 14.9 and 28.2 respectively.
    Yipee I’m getting good at this. :)

    Or hey could it be the lower the score the better? :roll:

    Bit like E-voting. Instant verdict.
    “Your photo is sh*** go find something better to do”

    :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:

    Mick451
    Participant
    thedarkroom
    Participant

    Got 2.4 for this, :D

    Sorry for all the edits. I’m having difficulty trying to post the image and can’t seem to get access to ImageShack to host the picture above so had to use the link format. Sorry for that!

    thedarkroom
    Participant

    Mick451 wrote:

    JB, I’m disappointed.
    By now I’d have expected you to have undertaken a project constructing some sort of wooden image quality control monitor from a pair of discarded RayBans (c 1957) and a garden chair. Perhaps with a cherrywood usb always-on connection which continually scans photographic images and, via some bespoke french oak jquery scripts and dutch elm XML feeds, calculates the angles to rotate overlaid polarising teak/pine/bamboo filters.
    Personally, i think you’ve been slacking lately.

    I heard he’s gone even more retro and is to be found measuring cave-openings to calculate aperture values for his new pin-hole camera project.

    jb7
    Participant

    Mick, I like your thinking-

    I think you’ve just described a kind of a Critique Cuckoo Clock,
    with opinions on the Quarter hour.

    Though I think the panel should consist of a dog called Judge,
    and be announced by a Cuckoo called Mr Crow.

    Entry will require a supply of Magic Buttons, of course.

    I’m onto it…

    I heard he’s gone even more retro and is to be found measuring cave-openings to calculate aperture values for his new pin-hole camera project.

    you know, you’re not too far wrong-
    calculations show the dilation to be optimal at 9cm.

    Though not cave openings, I don’t do caves…

    BM
    Participant

    sounds a bit rude

    you’ll have to start punishing yourself

Viewing 11 posts - 16 through 26 (of 26 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.