Search
Generic filters
Exact matches only

Nude photography

Homepage Forums General Photography The Lounge Nude photography

  • This topic is empty.

Nude photography

  • PeteTheBloke
    Member

    I’m going to ask the hostel for a refund

    justaguy
    Participant

    Mark wrote:

    j_

    Nude photography won’t be allowed on the site for the forseeable future.

    Thats a load of. I can finally stop asking people to undress.

    Mark
    Keymaster

    Folks this thread started in 2007.

    There has been an Art Nude forum on the site for quite some time now.
    This is announced at the time of its creation. As was mentioned then people need to apply via PM for access to it.

    PeteTheBloke
    Member

    Mark wrote:

    There has been an Art Nude forum on the site for quite some time now.

    I missed that. Are you telling me there are forums full of flaunted flesh on
    this very website and I didn’t even know?

    nfl-fan
    Participant

    I recall it being discussed… but I don’t remember a formal announcement.

    2007.. 2009.. it’s always good to talk.

    PeteTheBloke
    Member

    nfl-fan wrote:

    I recall it being discussed… but I don’t remember a formal announcement.

    Same here. After my puritanical comments on the subject I’d be scared to ask for
    access. Mind…. I was younger then, maybe it would be safe for a man of
    my advanced years to look at porn.

    PeteTheBloke
    Member
    nfl-fan
    Participant

    I’ve a strange feeling we might not be wearing the appropriate attire to enter that particular establishment.

    Martin
    Participant

    nfl-fan wrote:

    I recall it being discussed… but I don’t remember a formal announcement.

    2007.. 2009.. it’s always good to talk.

    Dont remember a formal announcement either

    To be honest I find it a bit sad that there is a hidden group that people must “Apply” for. I thought Ireland had grown up about these things it being 2009 and all that, but obviously not. As has been said this has been discussed and a decision was made

    Was wondering in the last while why the People section had gone down hill at a rate of knots. I understand now why.

    At a minimum the group should be shown with all other groups, that way people will know that it is there and can ask to join. At the moment for new members they will know nothing of this and will have to hear by word of mouth about the “Secret PI Group”

    All the best
    Martin

    shutterbug
    Participant

    nfl-fan wrote:

    I’ve a strange feeling we might not be wearing the appropriate attire to enter that particular establishment.

    :shock: well if your avatar is anything to go by………. :oops:

    nfl-fan
    Participant

    I’m changing that avatar today… too controversial.

    J

    cathald
    Participant

    nfl-fan wrote:

    I’m changing that avatar today… too controversial.

    J

    About time you changed that a pic of the hoff in his underbags just doesn’t do it for me.

    nfl-fan
    Participant

    I’m keeping it so…

    aoluain
    Participant

    Hmmmmmm just wondering how to start my 2 cents . . . .

    I think in general everyone’s point makes sense to some degree.

    If you can click on google and within 2 seconds you have more results on NUDE PHOTOGRAPHY
    than you could look at, why do we need it on PI?

    I would’nt mind either way whether it was an open section in the critique forum and I hav’nt missed it
    so far, but I think as The Bloke stated in his first post that the boundries would be over stepped
    at some stage. Anyway how do you define boundries?

    This type of photography [in my opinion] is certainly not black and white, there is a gradual merger
    between Art Nude, Glamour and Porn. Dont get me wrong I can appreciate the human form in whatever
    way presented particularly the female form :)

    I think Mark is right in some regards to have a ban on a certain type of picture but I think it should
    be a visible section in the critique forum, with limited access, surely there can be a password protected
    section manufactured? it would be in th critique section so photographers specialising in that field
    or beginners or whatever would know that they can post their work but at the same time
    not freely accessable to all. much the same as it is at the moment but with a visible presence.

    Now having said all that and being mindfull of Marks current stand on the Art Nude theme and with no offence
    to you mark, just my opinion . . .

    It is 2009, the catholic church does’nt have the same thumb on our forehead as it once did, SUGGESTIVE
    material is freely accessable from Radio, roadside and printed advertising, t.v, and of course the internet,
    our 14 year old knows more about sex, drugs and rock & roll that most of us knew when we were 18, and she
    knew that at 13!

    Does it really need to be censored so?

    Difficult one!

    nfl-fan
    Participant

    It’s all been discussed before Alan… and I think it’s water under the bridge now.

    There is a nude forum, it’s hidden from the general public and you have to apply for access.

    Fine with me… I just don’t think it was ever formally announced… so if you weren’t on the grapevine you’d be none the wiser… thus your post.

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 61 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.