Search
Generic filters
Exact matches only

Palmerstown River Estuary

Homepage Forums Photo Critique Landscape Palmerstown River Estuary

  • This topic is empty.

Palmerstown River Estuary

  • Podge
    Member

    Three from this weekend. My first attempt at taking this type of photo. I think I prefer the shorter exposures rather than the one where the stars leave trails.



    C&C welcome.

    sean1098
    Member

    they are hard to see,i think a bit dark for me,but i’m no expert.

    Sean.

    Martin
    Participant

    These look nice Podge but a bit dark as Sean said. I presume you have raw files for these so you should be able to get them brighter in the raw converter, worth doing cause they look nice

    M

    Mr.H
    Participant

    Middle one works for me Podge – Great colours – although may get a bit noisy when bigger.

    Gary

    Podge
    Member

    I’ve done some maths.

    The middle one was for 2 mins at f5 ISO 400.

    To reduce this to ISO 100

    ISO400 – 2 mins
    ISO200 – 4 mins
    ISO100 – 8 mins

    and to reduce it to f8

    f5 – 8 mins
    f5.6 – 16 mins
    f6.3 – 32 mins
    f7.1 – 64 mins
    f8 – 128 mins

    I reckon it probably should have been taken for 4 minutes to get the correct exposure which means

    ISO400 – 4 mins
    ISO200 – 8 mins
    ISO100 – 16 mins

    and to reduce it to f8

    f5 – 16 mins
    f5.6 – 32 mins
    f6.3 – 64 mins
    f7.1 – 128 mins
    f8 – 256 mins

    Better bring lots of hot water bottles next time.

    jb7
    Participant

    Your calculations falter slightly in the last section Podge-
    you seem to be making full stops out of third stops-

    But if we take 20mins 5.6 (seems a lot)
    then that should come down to about 40 seconds at f/1.2-

    Sorry, don’t know what focal length you’re using-
    but it looks medium wide-

    j

    Seaview
    Participant

    Middle one for me too, the colours are just great. The first and second images with the short exposure look very dark.

    Dave.

    Podge
    Member

    I thought there might be a mistake with the f stop sequence.

    From this page (see fractional stops) – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-number

    “the aperture that is one-third stop smaller than f/2.8 is f/3.2, two-thirds smaller is f/3.5, and one whole stop smaller is f/4. The next few f-stops in this sequence are
    f/4.5, f/5, f/5.6, f/6.3, f/7.1, f/8, etc.”

    and the scale further down

    “Typical one-third-stop f-number scale
    f/# 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.5 2.8 3.3 3.5 4 4.5 5.0 5.6 6.3 7 8 9 10 11 12.5 14 16 18 20 22 “

    Does this mean that f8 is just 1 1/3 stops down from f5 ?

    To simplfy things I think I should just take a test shot at f8 ISO1600 and then work it out as I did above to calculate the exposure time for ISO 100 ?

    PeteTheBloke
    Member

    One stop is a multiple of “route 2” approx 1.414.
    This is because doubling the amount of light hitting the film requires
    doubling the aperture area. As area changes by radius squared, we use
    a factor of route 2 instead of 2 to increase the aperture diameter.

    Hence f/2 + 1 stop = f2.8
    f/5 + 1 stop = f7
    f8 – 1 stop = f5.6

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.