- This topic is empty.
Would You?
-
:shock: Jesus….! :shock:
Brilliant NFL…. the entertainment that is…! not the pic of your arse…
Richie
Ive had people favourite photos ive shot of burlesque dancers, the people had no images up of their own so I initially came to the co conclusion that it was just a bit of voyeurism. I blocked them out of respect for the girl I photographed. I think this kind of thing is inevitable in the world of the internet and its not like flickr hasnt got more serious problems going on so i just take it in my stride.
I think before one of my normal kinda pics either a landscape or asports shot was favourtied by a member caled “dublin couple” they then added me as a contact when i accpeted assuming they were just interested in photography it turned out the only thin they enjoyed taking photo of was eachother wearing little or nothing :roll:
i did remove them :lol:
any one know them :shock:Pixelle wrote:
He obviously liked the…..
Are we jumping to the conclusion that it’s a he? :)
He had a male name Pixelle, so no jumping to conclusion!
Mark wrote:
Strange for sure.
Of course Sinead, if you hadn’t been taken crotch shots in the first place, you wouldn’t have this problem ;) :lol:
Just kidding :)They were people pictures (all of the person, not just the crotches)… I do have a thing (not a fetish!) about photographing feet though… Some of the feet pictures have on occasion been invited to dodgy groups but I always declined.
aoluain wrote:
Pardon my ignorance of the whole FLICKR thing,
but im struggling to know what shutter in talking about?from what i gather she has blocked someone from looking at her
picture . . . ?if he or she has a fetish for a certain type of image
or if they just like that single image, whats the issue?there is absolutely no excuse for images of kids for this sort of thing of course.
are we now going to post a warning with each erotic or fine art nude or fashion image
stating who may or may not look at it ?:?:
I blocked the person from marking my picture as a fave, as far as I know he can still look at it, I did this for a couple of reasons… He didn’t have any pictures of his own or any information about himself… All his other faves were of pictures of men, tight fitting clothes and bulges… Weird… But mostly I blocked him out of respect of the subjects (some of my club mates from the triathlon club).
None of the pictures he faved were fine art I can tell you that much. I’m not suggesting warnings but there is a huge difference in appreciation of art/photography and someone just being a bit of a perv don’t you think?ben4130 wrote:
Ive had people favourite photos ive shot of burlesque dancers, the people had no images up of their own so I initially came to the co conclusion that it was just a bit of voyeurism. I blocked them out of respect for the girl I photographed. I think this kind of thing is inevitable in the world of the internet and its not like flickr hasnt got more serious problems going on so i just take it in my stride.
Exactly!
And… yes this has turned out to be pretty funny, nfl, I can’t believe you did that :lol: I know I have said a few time that the members here are very generous but really, you are too kind………….. Really!
irishwonkafan is very knowledgeable.. so I’ve taken his advice.. irrespective of how odd it might seem. Here’s the result.. we’ll see how it goes.
Warning – Only click on this hyperlink if not easily offended or turned on by a fine male arse
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nfl-fan/2765699990/
PS. No commenting on the model.. took me two hours with the spot healing brush to clean this up.
This needs a CCW rotation. Also the composition is a little central orientated, try using the rule of thirds. This is where you imagine two horizontal and two vertical lines splitting the frame into nine squares. Next time try positioning the crack along one of the vertical lines. The blues might also look good a little more saturated to bring out the boxer shorts a little more. I think you were a little out of focus also.
Sorry if that sounds harsh but I think it’s a good first attempt.
Hebloodyhe!!!
John… how does it feel to know that your bare arse (or at least a pictorial representation of it) is probably adorning someone’s PC somewhere..(apart fromAlan’s that is…;-))
Serves ya right springs to mind :lol: :lol: :lol:
8)
why would I want to photograph MY butt and post it
on the internet in the first place? knowing once it goes up there its free for all!its a picture of my but it could belong to anyone and in no way does it identify me, or my personal details . . .
alan, in Galway. drives a blue car, works in gggkgjkh, has black hair, etc etc. ?I dont get it.
nfl-butt has been added as a favourite… below is a link to the proud owner… remember don’t click the link if easily offended but the few I’ve looked at seem fairly mild.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21654190N05/favorites/
The strange thing is… I’ve looked through half a dozen pages on this person’s faves… and they seem to be all women… I must have a very femine look rear end?
classic stuff there nfl. :lol: :lol: :lol: ………and congrats on becoming favs on those folks flickr accounts…..i guess :)
:)
Check this out…
Random Picss said (4 minutes ago):
Hi, I’m an admin for a group called Random Butt Crack, and we’d love to have this added to the group!I was very insulted… I mean I thought my butt crack was very special… not just something random!
:lol:
I’ve had such fun with this thread. Not much to add except ‘Ah, so THAT’S what it looks like from under a kilt’. Some really creative viewpoints! :lol:
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
