Search
Generic filters
Exact matches only

Adam.O.C

  • Adam.O.C
    Participant

    Would you split the lense…?

    Adam.O.C
    Participant

    Price dropped….

    1150 euro takes the two…:)

    Adam.O.C
    Participant

    Pictures ADDED…. :mrgreen:

    Adam.O.C
    Participant

    SOLD FOR 950 TODAY ON ADVERTS

    Adam.O.C
    Participant

    MAKE ME AN OFFER….. :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

    Adam.O.C
    Participant

    Reduced to 950….. :cry: :cry:

    Adam.O.C
    Participant
    Adam.O.C
    Participant

    They only seem to have one 62mm UV filter on the site…?

    Adam.O.C
    Participant

    That lens from the cameraman is now gone,

    I am seriously desperate for one, but cant really pay more then 900…:/

    ooo and will also take a 70-300 L and a 28-300 L

    Adam.O.C
    Participant

    http://www.adverts.ie/lenses/canon-ef-100-400mm-f-4-5-5-6l-is-usm/1831582″ onclick=”window.open(this.href);return false;

    Is this the lad you are speaking of dude…? If so, Im gonna be contacting him on Monday.

    Im gonna ring “camerman” tomorrow and after that, I cant do too much more, I dont know whats going on…:)

    Adam.O.C
    Participant

    GCP wrote:

    Adam,
    is the SCA3102 adapter I see in the Pics you posted part of the unit. Would you post it to me if I buy.

    Best regards,

    Gerry

    Hey Gerry, everything you see in the photo comes with it

    where in the country would it be posted…?

    Adam.O.C
    Participant

    Green Meanie wrote:

    cbrlover wrote:

    I wouldn’t change, you will be disappointed (unless you want the video option). I have a 1D mk11 and a 1D mk1V as well as a 7D and a 5Dmk1.

    The only thing the 7D gets used for is I take it on holiday because it has Video.

    I am not running down the 7D, it is in a different market and it stands out well in that section but up against the 1D mk11 it just doesn’t compare.

    My opinion only.

    You’re the man to listen to so as you can compare both :D

    Cheers dude, it was the iso performance and the bigger screen that was the main draw to it, cause when Im shooting at 1/30 for panning and then realise when i get home half them are rubbish, it is disheartening…:P but looks like im gonna stick with the mkii and invest in a 100-400l instead, thanks for all the input lads…:D

    Adam.O.C
    Participant

    Green Meanie wrote:

    warant wrote:

    I would say its more a downgrade !! to a 7d keep the mk2 or go for the mk3

    Warren

    http://www.industryimage.com” onclick=”window.open(this.href);return false;

    ]

    You think? :shock:

    8.2 MP vrs 18 MP
    Digic 2 vrs Dual Digic 4
    230K screen vrs 920K

    was just thinking myself, and the price difference between the 1d mkiii and 7d is too much

    Adam.O.C
    Participant

    Hmmmmmm I see what you mean….:P surely in every situation of handheld, IS while handheld, no matter what the mode, its gonna improve the shot

    I feel I got the hang of panning and such, but I just wanna increase my “keep rate”, I go to these racing events, take over 1000 photos, come home and delete over 50-60% and in the most cases, I dont catch a crash or other incident cause of it being blurred to be-jesus to make out…:P

    Adam.O.C
    Participant

    cheers dude, yeah I stuck them up on there cause its the site I probably look on most…:)

    I just cleaned the sensor the night before, but some must have clinged back on, thats just the drawback of using a camera thats almost 10 years old…:)

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)