[dave j]

September 28, 2007 at 7:34 pm

Thanks for the comments guys, I might go for the 17-85 now….. descisions descisions…. does it ever get easier.. lol

[dave j]

September 26, 2007 at 11:04 pm

Thanks for the responses, I’ll probably go for the 28-135mm f3.5 as my walk around.
if i’m feeling a bit flush i might invest in a 20-35mm f4 for dedicated landscapes they are pretty reasonable on e-bay at the moment.
another question, has anyone any experience of the 70-300mm f4-5.6 is usm lens, christmas is coming…. lol and I would have most things covered with those 3 lens.. i think….
also I am only just getting into the whole digital slr area from 35mm, and for landscapes I nearly always used a polarising filter, can you do this with a dslr, or is it a no no ?
Dave

[dave j]

September 26, 2007 at 9:16 pm

Thanks for the reply Steve, I can get the 40D and the lens in a kit for about $1650, or the 17-85 for another 100$ so i’m trying to decide what to get, I’m leaning towards the 28-135 because of the f 3.5 instead of f4…. does it make that much of a difference ?
Dave