[dave100]

November 13, 2011 at 9:39 am

Thankyou Miki

[dave100]

November 12, 2011 at 5:24 pm

Yes Jenny silver and red glitter mixed in her hands. One strobe used through translucent umbrella at 1/8 power three feet in front of model to light her face. One strobe camera left snooted, pointed sideways to the right at the same height as model’s hands at 1/2 power to light the glitter. Friend on right of model holding silver reflector pointed towards positioned strobe to reflect light back in the space where the glitter would be blown. 3rd strobe about one foot in front of model at waist height pointed to the sky at 1/4 power (zoomed in to 85 mm) to light glitter above, after it was blown towards the lens.

[dave100]

November 11, 2011 at 11:46 am

Thanks Charley – we had good fun trying to capture this image

[dave100]

September 30, 2011 at 10:54 am

It would look better without the shoes now that you mention it. Thanks for your feedback guys…

[dave100]

August 19, 2011 at 7:08 pm

Thanks Phillip. I could take a little off the right to make it tighter alright.

[dave100]

September 25, 2010 at 10:37 pm

Thanks for the feedback Lawrence

[dave100]

September 25, 2010 at 2:27 am

Jess, the only options available to me under Mode once my images has been processed in Lab mode with one channel deleted are multichannel, gray scale and bitmap. Cant see how to switch back to 8 bit colour?

Bren, thanks for the tutorial, I will give it a go to see how my images turn out.

[dave100]

September 24, 2010 at 8:46 pm

Thanks Eddie, they will be worth a look next time I’m in Dublin

[dave100]

August 18, 2010 at 9:04 pm

Cool just checking

[dave100]

August 18, 2010 at 8:10 pm

Would you be interested in a nikon 12-24 f/4

[dave100]

February 9, 2010 at 4:30 pm

Thanks Liam

[dave100]

February 7, 2010 at 6:09 pm

Couldn’t have said it better Alan –

Btw I didn’t loose my job either – and I don’t have a family but what if….

[dave100]

February 6, 2010 at 11:41 pm

cathald wrote:

I think you are being a cheap skate here to be honest

redfox wrote:

This is the type of thing that you see on all the photography forums(I’m getting married and cant afford a ……)
Sorry to sound harsh but you can get your wedding covered for less than a grand

cathald wrote:

Sorry for the rant

Cathal

Gents,

I don’t have any issue with anybody expressing an opinion but I did find Cathalds remarks in his first post rather offensive and inconsiderate. Less than a grand is great for photographs if you have plenty of cash. What if you have a family and have been made redundant in recent months? A grand can mean a lot of money then…

My choice suits me and the photographer that has decided to avail of this opportunity. He has also agreed to part with copyright of the images as long as he can use them as part of his portfolio to win future business. Not a problem for me.

Thread closed obviously lies with the moderators etc – it was my way of saying, “that’s all I have to say on the matter”.

Daithi

[dave100]

February 6, 2010 at 3:39 pm

Cathal and Noel,

I wasn’t looking for anybody’s rants or general opinions to be honest. If I were, I would have asked for them.

How one chooses to spend their hard earned cash on their day is up to them. If somebody with good photographic ability is looking to get into this business and expand their portfolio then this a great opportunity.

I have spoken with several people who were more than happy to take me up on my offer so it’s a win win for all concerned.

Cheers for your two pence worth – this thread is now closed.

[dave100]

February 3, 2010 at 7:52 pm

Thanks Red fox –

I had applied extra Gaussian blurr through ps but went over board a bit to the point that it looked a bit fake overall. This is more or less straight off the camera..

daithi