one thing to look out for in relation to the lower end nikons is if you plan to use primes the low end camera bodies don’t have a motor to drive the auto focus on the lens so this would limit you prime lens choice to the 35 1.8G and the 50 1.4G unless you want to MF
you can buy a kit from http://www.bokehmasterskit.com/” onclick=”window.open(this.href);return false; – I have it – plenty of pre cut shapes great for this time of year especially with all the Christmas lights etc …. works best on a 50 1.8 or 1.4 they have some recommendations on the site
On books – I have found that the Scot Kelby “The Digital Photography Book”, Volume 1,2,3 are great for getting immediate improvements in your photography. They are written like a collection of tips, well written and you’ll get through the books in no time and soon start to see improvements.
I have a d300 and often use the picture controls to for general available light of my kids in the house and it works quite well to give a light sepia look. I always shoot raw and jpeg so I always have the colour version available. see pic below more or less straight from the camera
Picture Control
contrast +1
filter effect orange
toning sepia 2
BTW I bought the 35 1.8 g from Birmingham’s cameras ordered on Friday in Cavan on Monday morning – dearer than the wed but worth it – you can negotiate on the delivery etc
if you currently only have kit lens I would get the 50 1.4 G or the 35 1.8G as you will find it more versatile than the 60 2.8 or a longer lens. Both the 50 1.4 and 35 1.8 are great for available light.
The 50 1.4 is the lens I use most for people shots – I know the longer focal length would be better for portraits but the distance required between the photographer and the subject can be a problem with longer focal lengths
I have also just bought the 35 1.8G as I wanted to go a bit wider ( more environmental).
I would have a think about exactly what type of portraits you intend to before you invest and do a quick search on flicker for each of the lenses and see if you like what you see.
Good pic!
I like the processing but the burnt out highlights on the child’s face are distracting.
Also I think it would be great pic with the child as the subject .. the expression on her face is great but the guy in the background it to prominent for me. For me a crop and darken down the background slightly and you have great pic ……just my opinion
one way to get your daughter and the background exposed correctly is to expose correctly for the background and then to use flash to light your daughter.
An easy way to do this would be to get the correct exposure for the background dial it manually into the camera and the play with the flash in manual until you are happy with the exposure and you now have both the background your daughter correctly exposed. The trick is make is look like you haven’t used flash by balancing the two exposures.
Do a google search for balancing flash and daylight.
here is an example of this ( not mine its by Peter Searle [fantastic environmental portraits]) although I expect there was more than just a flash used…..
Watch your white balance as you camera may switch the white balance to flash as soon as you turn on you flash this will alter the colour of the image so set the white balance manually to suit the main light.
if I were you I’d go back and try it a again as the location is fantastic