Hurra! Thank you to who ever voted for me, any time I get even single vote I’m prety chuffed given the standard on here.
Congratulations to the, worthy as ever, winners.
The text underneith looks a bit blocky to me. Tahoma looks like Arial to me, which is Grotesque made to look like Helvetica. So lets take a look in Helvetica it’s self.
Note the difference in the e and a. Still looks a little heavy so lets go to Neu Helvetica, which I have in a light version.
Not only is it a bit lighter it’s a bit more stylish and geometric. The round charaters are more circular. Franklin Gothic is a step further in this dirrection. Here’s another font that goes further in that dirrection. News Gothic.
Had to get rid of the bold as it made things imballanced. Bit Art Decco? OK lets go further. Less geometry but some vertical stress with Optima (which in some ways is half way between a serif and a sans-serif font).
OK lets stick some serifs in for a more femanin (weddings/life style portrait) and slightly softer and traditional (fine art landscape) look. Baskerville.
And here’s what you get for 30 Euro if you buy a profesional OpenType font and turn on ligatures and alternative chars for the top line. Similar to Baskerville, this ones Warnock Pro.
On the Steven Hanna the letter spacing vs word spacing could perhaps do with a little tweeking. Reduce the letter spacing and increase the word spacing a little. With the text underneath it’s the other way round. The letter spacing looks a little cramped and the word spacing a little wide. Perhaps this is the font you’ve gone for as much as anything. It’s designed for packing words into small spaces.
Would the hyphen be better off as a full em?
When choosing just how light to go with the gray on the back remember that people organising a wedding and anyone keeping your card for professional reasons may well keep the card in an organiser where the front won’t be visable.
Not masivly keen on the photography being in a smaller font. Makes the horizontals look a bit imballanced? I’d recon a single rectangle sitting in the middle of the card rather than a big one on the left and a smaller on on the right, if you get me, would look better. I suposse the text underneath balance it out, in which case the x height of ‘photography’ is too high.
Tahoma is a font commisioned and supplied by Mircosoft. It’s designed to make easily readable text when displayed in a browser at 75ppi. It’s the slightly more condenced and vertical sister of Verdana. Used here it give a bit of a classic type writerish feel to me but it’s a bit lacking character when used as a heading font for my money. Lucida Sans, also a ‘screen’ font, is a very similar font but the t in it has a smaller riser so might work better with the rest of the name, which is prety square and monospace. If you’re looking for that cold and clinical style then it might be worth searching out a font called Univers. It has an almost steely quality to it. The slightly boxier look of eurostyle might be worth checking out too. Or for a bit more warmth try Franklin Gothic.
Some hyphens in the phone numbers would help muppets like me who can’t remember a full number all in one go.
I’m not sure how ‘modern’ you design is. It looks a bit late 80s to me, a bit sterio typical ‘fashion photographer’, and bares little relation to the kind of photography you’ve listed (I have to ask why you’re pitching for weddings and landscapes and yet your web site mostly has motobikes on it).
I think you’ve realised it your self but the over all color balance is all over the place. The least relevent information sticks out and the text font is to heavy and conjested.
The details not quite right either. For instance the phone numbers aren’t formatted consistently. In the first two the kerning on the Capital letters is too wide. the email address is impersonal, where as the card is personal.
Fixing things up a bit…
OK that’s not going to win any awards for originality but the over all layout is more balanced. The text font (Gill Sans light) is in line with the size of the card, doesn’t compete with the ‘Steven Hanna’ for attention but isn’t overwelmed either. The ‘Steven Hanna’ heading is the uneque thing that identifies the the card when someone is looking for it so I’ve applied a spot colour. Over all I’ve gone for fonts that softern things up. The distressed heading (The King & Queen font avaiable from http://www.dafont.com) is reasonably trendy and, when used here, gives you a more natural style i.e. ‘fine art landscape’ rather than ‘neo-dada hairdresser’.
With a stripped down design like this, things like a sattin laminate or embossed lettering realy work well.
Business cards have two sides. Use one for style and one for info. With a simple layout like the above on one side printing a colourful image, like your photo of the blue bell wood, on the reverse make a nice contrast. Just having a strong solid colour on the reverse with ‘Steven Hanna’ in white or a pale tone would works as well.
oh dear … Dj on the mike. I used to Dj at a club where they glued up the mix plugs just to ensure the guest DJs never (ever) got the idea into their head
There are 177 entered for the series (6 Sundays, of which last weekend was the first)
It’s not as big as it was a few years ago when the Dunleary boats used to venture north but the Autumn league is still a big deal. At lot of boats you don’t see week in week out are entered. There was quite a lot of damage done last weekend and if the forcast stays bad then it may put a few more off. I still think you’ll get 100+ to the start line.