Those images get used on posters and promo material that will net the band money. The better the photo, the more likely random strangers are going to be inclined to see a band they’ve never heard.
Let’s say a band is playing upstairs in Whelans. First they need to pay the venue, then posters, then someone on the door etc. So before the band play a single note, they have to pay around €300. 60 people at €5, before they break even. Good poster that helps bring in people, say 200 people.. that’s €1000. A gig is more likely to be €10 though, so even if half balk, the band still make money.
Should the photographer get paid? Bloody right they should. Especially as the poster will get used again and again, and the photo used for press and PR in national magazines and papers.
If you don’t want to charge, that’s fine by me, just don’t assume that’s how everyone feels. If you undervalue you work, there’s plenty of people out there that won’t and will make the most of the free ride.
I’ve used the trial version of PTlens and liked it. Should have bought it when it was $15 though!
I’m not sure how it can be used in conjunction with Mogrify though.
Wow.. that is some difference. It makes you wonder about the changes that will happen in photos we’ve taken.
Landscapes feel a little more permanent than people images, but this shows changes on a larger scale.
I completely understood where you were coming from Andy. And I took it in that spirit. And you’re not wrong either, I was just glad to come away with something. When things are right, it can be amazing. Other times it sucks. This time I was trying to reduce the suckage :)
Forgot to mention the curve.. Yep. hate that. Both the 17-40 and the 24-70 barrel ridiculously on full frame. I couldn’t get over how bad it is.
As these are just exports from Lightroom which has no lens distortion correction, I have to live with it until I’m creating final exports for Photoshop.
Thanks for your comments Andy. I appreciate you taking time to critique.
The bay is so busy in terms of features that it’s hard to get clean composition. Being the backseat passenger meant that I had less choice over locations, and in all truth had given up hope of getting anything.
I have lightened the rock, but obviously not enough. The aim was to keep it simple. I use lines and form to lead in all the time, but here there was little to use. As to formulaic, isn’t all good landscape photography to an extent? Even the process of using leading lines and curves is a forumla. Rules of thirds, golden mean, golden spiral? All formula.
Your points are both well made and well taken. I’m still happy with the image seeing as I actually had walked almost a mile after going back to the jeep to offload my wellies! Bearing in mind that I didn’t think there would be anything, I could’ve gotten much worse.