Do use use you camera on “manual”? Mostly Yes ( Most my cameras do not have anything that says “auto” in them. Im too poor to have things with anykinda automode in them)
Do you manipulate your photographs? Digital images, mostly yes. Otherwise I try not to manipulate them.
Do you use autofocus or manual focus? I like too much all kinda vintakge things to have anything auto… in my cameras.
Do you photoshop your images? If I do any digital work, absolutely Yes. (real world is just too ugly to stand, have to make things a bit unrealistic)
Do use use a professional camera? Well, one of them use to be pro, ages ago. Now that is just too old to be anything other than my toy. And other cameras are indeed mostly my toys.
but there is common thing that in art, literature, plays, movies, music etc.
its GENRE. Every single play, song, picture, book is kinda catecorized (or put in some “style” section after something ore someone that inpired creater).
And mostly if something “art” is totally unidentified without any information or even a hint of witch “genre” it will feel strange. Somehow is some natural need to put everyting in some catecore. (maybe to make more sense to this worl)
and if you see a photo up just as “a photo”,no other explanation, how should you know the way to concider that.
put if the same photo is shown a pressfoto or clamour b&w photo, wildlifephoto for a magazine, does that make it any easier to kinda compare that piece with other similar images and help good or not judging.
well, we kinda actually know quite a lot of information behind it. Like time and era when it was made, the style that it represents, why it was made, was was the porpouse of it (originally, it is a portrai of a lady), whitch tehbique is used on it etc…
and it is defenently the most know picture of its style and era, but not especially to best one. Most of the glory around it is just based ,after all, on few individual opinions that it is “the most wonderful picture”… like a snowball effect. (ones strong opinion takes weaker mindeds opinions with and so on…)
and Da Vinci?s scethings are so much more interesting (with all information he put on them)
I consider myself as an artist, so option A is more suitable for me.
But I have done some works for someone else too, so sometimes I kinda am able to please other people too.
My pics are windows to my world. I try to capture things that I like find somehow special.
well, stealing is very true and unfortune thing nowdays.
I do have a proof also.
My friend found pic that SHE have taken in a porn site, some years a go, even her “sign” was still on those pics. The photographer that had those pics unher HIS name was totally different person than my frind.
So she made some moves, and they shutted down that site, but never found out who was the one that stole her pics.
~~~~~~~~~~~
I also have a thoughts for do again another dibloma,
and those courses seems quite ok.
I like to know if anyone here have any good tips (or just a quide) how studying works in this country.
I have no clue of anything on systems you have here.
(I tried to find out something but now I feel complitely lost)
If you have any interest to help me about studying systems in this country please PM me
That is so lovely pic.
And really nicely done.
I truly like her face, so cute smile.
And one really good thing of this picture is the freedom feeling.
No one is telling that little girl, that it is not ok for a girl to have fun in muddy puddle.